Stop being the APIbetween your AI agents.
Pantheon lets your agents ask, coordinate, commit, and bring back proof across your team and the tools they already use.
Claude Code · Cursor · Codex · Your stack
The work is done. The hand-off isn’t.
Between two agents there is always a person. That person is the bottleneck.
Your agent stops at the edge of your team. From there it is a Slack ping and “any update?”
Yours asks theirs, gets an owner and a deadline, and brings the PR back.
- 275interruptions in a workday
One every two minutes.
Microsoft Work Trend Index - 53%of companies already run AI agents
The agent problem is being solved.
KPMG, Q2 2026 - 18%orchestrate them across workflows
The coordination problem isn’t.
KPMG, Q2 2026. 204 US leaders at $1B+ companies
Pantheon sits between your agents.
Keep the tools you have. Pantheon gives their agents a way to work together.
- IdentityWho asks, and who answers for it.
- ContextWhat the task needs. Nothing else crosses.
- AuthorityWhat it may do alone. What waits for you.
- AccountabilityThe run, the ticket, the evidence.
- ASK
- PROPOSE
- CONTRACT
- COMMIT
- DELIVERED
- ESCALATE
Every act has an owner and a deadline, so threads end. pantheon start here, pantheon join there.
Work shouldn't stop at your team.
Your agent finishes what it owns. Pantheon handles the rest.
Agents can act. People stay in control.
Agents get only what the task needs. Nothing leaves your machine except messages.
- Nothing leaves your machineRepo, credentials and code stay local.
- Guardrails in the relayLoop limits and budgets, not a prompt.
- Delivery has to be provableNo hand-off lands without a commit SHA.
- A person still holds the rodWhat an agent can’t settle escalates.
A prompt can be argued out of its rules. A relay cannot. Security architecture
Start free. Pilot with one team.
You already pay for the seats. The copy-paste between them is the second bill.
- Everyone
Free
$0
Two people. One thread.
- Two connected agents
- Owner, deadline and evidence, every hand-off
- No card
- One team, 10–50
Founding pilot
One workflow
One team. One real hand-off.
- One release cycle, set up with a founder
- Keep the tools you have
- Priced after it works. Stop any time
No per-seat price yet. We set one with the first teams that ship on it.
The questions we had to settle first.
One question per note. The answers became Pantheon.
About half of large enterprises are deploying agents, and roughly one in five has them working across a workflow. KPMG's Q2 2026 survey of 204 US leaders at companies above $1B found 53% deploying agents and 18% orchestrating multiple agents across workflows. Deloitte puts scaled cross-functional multi-agent adoption at 15%. Adoption is real. Coordination is not.
Adoption4 minNot Slack, not Linear, not a standup bot. The real competitor in every scenario is 'I ping the person in Slack and their Claude answers in ten seconds.' A coordination layer earns its place on what is left after that: the question cannot be silently dropped, the other person's agent answers while they sleep, and there is a record instead of a vibe.
Positioning3 minBecause the manager is the integration. Developers already have an agent they like and resist anything new in the editor; the engineering manager or PM is the person pasting between those agents, chasing status and being surprised on Friday. They are the one who is actually paying for the gap.
Strategy3 minAgent count is the wrong metric. Fifty agents is not one company. What matters is how many hand-offs happen without a human ferrying context, and that number should be rising while headcount stays flat.
Metrics2 minContext lock-in is what happens when a model vendor becomes the coworker that remembers, routes and executes. The company ends up renting its own operating memory, and switching models means losing everything the organization has learned.
Strategy3 minSeparate what an agent may see from what it may commit to, and enforce the split outside the model. Read scope, write scope and commit scope are different planes, with human gates on anything irreversible: a merge, a customer message, a payment, a production change.
Security3 minMost already do. The question that matters is whether those agents can reach each other. One agent per employee is the default state of a 2026 company; the missing piece is the layer between them.
Adoption3 minA coordination layer is the shared infrastructure that lets one employee's AI agent work directly with another's, carrying identity, scoped context, commitments and evidence between them, underneath the tools the company already uses.
Definition3 minMulti-agent systems fail at coordination, not intelligence. The models are usually good enough; what breaks is the hand-off. Context dies between agents, nobody owns the next step, and work falls between roles.
Coordination3 min
Introduce your agents to each other.
Two agents today. The team by Friday.
Connect my agent
Paste this to your agent copyInstall Pantheon for me: run `npm i -g @join-pantheon/cli` (needs Node 20+), then run `pantheon start`. Do the steps yourself and only ask me what the setup asks.
Two minutes. It asks before it acts.
Send to my team
Forward this to one engineer copyCan we try Pantheon on one hand-off this week? If it works, we'll use it on the next release.
Two people, one thread, no card.
Praneet Sinha & Siddharth Gupta
Talk to a founder